{"id":35306,"date":"2025-06-27T01:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-27T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/redept.org\/blogosfera\/posicionamentos-para-reportagens-sobre-condicoes-de-trabalho-da-colheita-de-cafe-na-colombia\/"},"modified":"2025-06-27T01:00:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-27T04:00:00","slug":"posicionamentos-para-reportagens-sobre-condicoes-de-trabalho-da-colheita-de-cafe-na-colombia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/posicionamentos-para-reportagens-sobre-condicoes-de-trabalho-da-colheita-de-cafe-na-colombia\/","title":{"rendered":"Posicionamentos para reportagens sobre\u00a0condi\u00e7\u00f5es de trabalho da colheita de caf\u00e9 na Col\u00f4mbia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Leia o relat\u00f3rio completo <a href=\"https:\/\/reporterbrasil.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/ReporterBrasil_Cafe_Colombia_PT.pdf\">aqui<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<h1><strong>FAIRTRADE<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p><strong>Responses to questions from Rep\u00f3rter Brasil about coffee farms and worker conditions in Colombia<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Please note: Cooperativa Departamental de Cafeicultores de Hu\u00edla (Cadefihuila) and the Cooperative de Caficultores de Salgar are Fairtrade certified producer organisations and therefore must adhere to the Fairtrade Standard for Small-scale Producer Organisations not the Fairtrade Standard for Hired Labour Organisations that Rep\u00f3rter Brasil referred to.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The small scale producer organisation certification does not recognise individual farms but the members who own the farms and therefore further investigation is needed to confirm that the farms named \u201cFinca La Siberia\u201d and \u201cLos Naranjos\u201d are owned by members of a Fairtrade certified cooperative.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>1) In the case of certified producers who hire workers, Fairtrade includes the obligation to formalize written employment contracts for temporary workers who work for three months or more on the estate (Criterion 3.5.7.). A copy of this employment contract is provided to the workers (Criterion 3.5.8.). Has this criterion been breached in the cases presented?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Cooperativa Departamental de Cafeicultores de Hu\u00edla (Cadefihuila) is a Fairtrade certified small producer organisation and therefore must adhere to the Fairtrade Standard for Small-scale Producer Organisations. Section 3.3.24 of the Standard requires that all permanent workers have a legally binding contract and that they understand the terms of the contract. These contracts may be verbal as per Colombian national law. Furthermore, Section 3.3.23 states that migrant or seasonal workers who are employed must also meet the requirement of the Standard.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>This applies to farmers who employ more than 10 workers, who work more than 30 hours per week, and who work for at least one month during the year.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Any violations of the Fairtrade Standard must be reported to FLOCERT, Fairtrade\u2019s independent certifier, who checks for these breaches in their thorough investigations. FLOCERT will have to investigate to determine any breach of the Fairtrade Standard.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2) Fairtrade also requires that temporary workers\u2019 accommodation \u201cguarantees structural security\u201d and \u201creasonable levels of decency, privacy, safety and hygiene, and includes regular maintenance\u201d (Criterion 3.5.27.). Sanitary facilities must have toilets and showers with clean water. Has this criterion been breached in the cases presented?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Fairtrade Standard for Small-scale Producer Organisations Section 3.3.32 requires clean toilets\/latrines with hand washing facilities close by for workers. These facilities must be separate for women and men and the number of facilities is in proportion to the number of workers.<\/p>\n<p>This applies to farmers who employ more than 10 workers, who work more than 30 hours per week and who work for at least one month during the year.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Again, any violations of the Fairtrade Standard must be reported to FLOCERT, Fairtrade\u2019s independent certifier, who checks for these breaches in their investigations. FLOCERT will have to investigate to determine any breach of the Fairtrade Standard.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3) Fairtrade also points out that the maximum weekly working hours allowed by certification is 48 hours a week (Criterion 3.5.9.). However, workers on certified farms interviewed by the report claim to work from sun up to sun down, exceeding the maximum limit of 8 hours a day. How does Fairtrade monitor compliance with this criterion?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The 48 hours refer to the Fairtrade Standard for Hired Labour Section 3.5.9 that states that companies must comply with applicable national and local legislation and industry standards regarding working hours and overtime regulations.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>While we have identified the two organisations you mentioned as being certified as small producer organisations, which means the Hired Labour Standard does not apply. Fairtrade only certifies SPOs in coffee, no estates\/plantations, as 95 percent of\u00a0Latin American coffee\u00a0farms are smaller than five hectares.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>For small producer organisations, section 1.1.0.21 of FLOCERT\u2019s Compliance Criteria is applicable. It states that \u201cthere are no indications that you or your members violate national legislation on the topics covered by this standard.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Only in case that one of the small producer organisations members or the small producer organisation itself has more than 10 workers that are present for one month or more during a year working more than 30 hours per week or equivalent, must the SPO also adhere to additional Compliance Criteria from the Small-scale Producer Organisation Standard.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding the way FLOCERT conducts its checks \u2013 FLOCERT checks during any audit\/investigation if working hours are in compliance with the applicable legal requirements in Colombia. We do this by checking contracts and records of overtime and potentially conduct worker interviews. Under Colombian law the weekly working hours are 46 hours, allowing for up to two extra hours per day\/12 extra hours per week.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4) Does Fairtrade believe that the cases presented in the report are in line with Fairtrade\u2019s mission to \u201cmake trade fairer for the people who grow our food\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Fairtrade International does not all believe that these allegations are in line with our mission and values. We believe that farmers and workers should be paid a fair price and that they have decent working conditions and can help build sustainable livelihoods. We have chosen to work in areas where producers struggle with poverty and lack of stability so that we can make a difference. We take all allegations of workers\u2019 rights violations very seriously, and we view any form of exploitation and abuse as unacceptable.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>It is important to remember that no certification scheme can guarantee that there are no worker rights violations. However, compliance with our rigorous Standards is checked through regular audits by our independent certifier FLOCERT. The audits involve physical inspections of fields, plants and offices as well as document and finance reviews and confidential interviews with staff members.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5) What actions will Fairtrade take after becoming aware of the cases presented by Rep\u00f3rter Brasil?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Fairtrade Standards contain clear language prohibiting these violations based on the International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions and recommendations. Fairtrade takes immediate steps to follow-up to act to protect the people involved when an allegation is made.<\/p>\n<p>To address these allegations, here\u2019s what we have done:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>We have referred the allegations to the Fairtrade International Protection Committee, as per our Act to Protect policy. This committee reviews and refers allegations to one or more of our producer networks, whose trained staff undertake a safe follow-up assessment. In this case, the Latin American and Caribbean Network of Fair Trade Small Producers and Workers (CLAC) was notified.<\/li>\n<li>We have also referred the allegations to our independent certifier, FLOCERT, for follow up on the certification side. Still, we strongly encourage anyone with information about suspected violations of Fairtrade Standards to report them confidentially to FLOCERT, whether via their<strong> <\/strong>multilingual<strong> <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.flocert.net\/flocert-launches-whatsapp-for-allegations\/\">WhatsApp channel<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flocert.net\/about-flocert\/vision-values\/quality-and-appeals\/\">website, email, or telephone.<\/a> This enables more targeted and effective follow-up. Each allegation is reviewed on a case-by-case basis to determine the best course of action to enable safe outcomes for impacted persons.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>6) Information on Fairtrade-certified producer associations is published on the FLOCERT platform. Why isn\u2019t Fairtrade transparent about certified properties? Does the organization plan to move forward with transparency mechanisms for certificates at farm level?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>FLOCERT issues certificates for small producer organisations \u2013 cooperatives that are the legal entity with who FLOCERT has contractually binding relations. The members of such cooperatives in coffee are individual smallholder farmers. In each small producer organisation audit, we check the current member list of any cooperative and sample production conditions with members.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Whether \u201cFinca La Siberia\u201d and \u201cFinca Los Naranjos\u201d are farms owned by cooperative members will be investigated. In general, the prevalence of very similar farm names, the need for verification of field\/farm ownership, plus additional exact location checks require careful investigation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Follow-up questions sent by Rep\u00f3rter Brasil (31\/03\/2025)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1) Even in the case of hiring a considerable number of seasonal workers, does Fairtrade consider this producer to be a \u201csmall-scale producer\u201d just because he is linked to a producers\u2019 cooperative? What is the criteria adopted?<\/p>\n<p>2) Why are there no criterias regarding the accommodation of seasonal workers in the \u201cFairtrade Standard for Small-scale Producer Organizations\u201d, given that, even under these terms, the hiring of migrant and seasonal workers is common?<\/p>\n<p>3) In view of the information presented above, can Fairtrade confirm whether \u201cFinca La Siberia\u201d and \u201cFinca Los Naranjos\u201d are Fairtrade certified farms owned by Fairtrade certified cooperative members and whether the certification status will change after the information provided by Rep\u00f3rter Brasil about the work conditions on these two farms?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fairtrade<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1) The Fairtrade Standard for Small-scale Producer Organisations (SPO) defines an SPO not by the number of workers, but by the size by hectares of the farms: \u201cThe maximum size of the cultivated land where a member grows a Fairtrade crop is equal to or below 30 hectares.\u201d The standard also defines for the farms: \u201cSmall\u2013scale producers are farmers who are not structurally dependent on permanent hired labour and who manage their production activity mainly with family workforce.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>2) The Small-scale Producer Organisation Standard does not have a requirement on workers housing like the Hired Labour Standard (Section 3.5.27). Fairtrade recognises that it needs to do more to ensure the benefits of Fairtrade reach workers on smallholder farms, including temporary, seasonal, and migrant workers. The SPO Standard reviews in the recent years have sought to strengthen workers\u2019 rights (such as accommodations) through improved labour conditions. It is, however, important to note that many farmers earn very little and some sell only a fraction of their products on Fairtrade terms and therefore requiring them to provide accommodation for workers is a tall order. Fairtrade seeks multi-stakeholder commitment to improve the livelihoods of farmers and subsequently, workers in this context, through pathways such as living income strategy and human rights commitment.<\/p>\n<p>In reference to the \u201ccommon use\u201d of seasonal workers: Smallholders hire workers during the coffee harvest, however many farmers (some 66%) just hire them for some days a year, and it\u2019s usually less than a week.<\/p>\n<p>3) We would not immediately decertify based on these allegations. We will, however, as mentioned in our earlier communication investigate further. Each allegation is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. If violations of our Standards are found, then we would act accordingly.<\/p>\n<h1><strong>RAINFOREST ALLIANCE<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>The Rainforest Alliance recognizes the human rights challenges affecting coffee supply chains in Latin America, and we take allegations of violations within our certification program very seriously. Whenever we are presented with credible, concrete evidence of human rights violations on any certified operations, we conduct our own investigation. If that investigation confirms violations of our certification program\u2019s rules, the certificate holder is given the opportunity to take corrective action within a designated time-period. If the issue is not resolved, the farm stands to have its certification suspended or canceled, which is stated clearly in the <a href=\"https:\/\/knowledge.rainforest-alliance.org\/docs\/faq-rainforest-alliance-certification-assurance-and-support\">rules of our program<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding the points raised in your reporting, the Rainforest Alliance states that:\u00a0<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Finca San Fernando has not yet been Rainforest Alliance-Certified. While the farm has applied for certification, it still needs to undergo an auditing process by an independent third-party Certification Body <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rainforest-alliance.org\/business\/certification\/how-to-get-rainforest-alliance-certified-a-guide-for-farmers\/\">in accordance with our standard<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Certificate Holder Finca La Arboleda took immediate actions to address non-conformities related to work contracts and housing conditions following a<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rainforest-alliance.org\/business\/certification\/the-rainforest-alliance-assurance-system-supporting-due-diligence-across-the-supply-chain\/\"> regular audit<\/a> by an independent third-party Certification Body in 2024, and these non-conformities were closed later in the same year after a follow-up audit. However, after receiving the information provided by Rep\u00f3rter Brasil, the Rainforest Alliance will conduct further investigations to verify that these non-conformities have been effectively resolved in accordance with our certification program\u2019s requirements and local regulations.<\/li>\n<li>At the Rainforest Alliance, we believe that addressing human rights challenges in agricultural supply chains requires a systemic and multi-stakeholder approach to collaboration. That\u2019s why, as part of our <a href=\"https:\/\/knowledge.rainforest-alliance.org\/docs\/faq-2020-assurance-program\">assurance<\/a> activities, we have involved the International Labour Organization in training sessions for certification bodies over the past few years. With these activities, we aim to strengthen the capacity of certification bodies to assess our standard\u2019s requirements within the context of local regulations.<\/li>\n<li>It is important to emphasize that our mission is to contribute to making agricultural production more sustainable and to promote the continuous improvement of production and working conditions in production chains. In this way, we also believe it is important to give individuals and organizations the opportunity to remain in our program after correcting their conduct and demonstrating a commitment to keeping them in line with the law and certification rules in order to contribute to the improvement of production chains as a whole.\u00a0<\/li>\n<li>We are committed to protecting certificate holders\u2019 data, including farmer and farm group locations, according to our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rainforest-alliance.org\/privacy-policy\/\">privacy policy<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rainforest-alliance.org\/resource-item\/2020-sustainable-agriculture-standard-farm-requirements\/\">standard<\/a>. We only share this information with select third parties, such as auditors and certification bodies, in order to support the certification program. For example, we may share information with auditors to confirm certification audit data. We may also share anonymized and aggregated certification-related information with third-party researchers.\u00a0<\/li>\n<li>The Rainforest Alliance Certification program is based on a model of continuous improvement and should not be viewed as a panacea. The system is designed to consider the various realities and complexities of different countries and sectors while providing flexible assurance systems. While certification serves as a valuable mechanism for mitigating risks and promoting responsible practices, no single organization can address these deeply complex challenges on its own. Human rights issues in agriculture require a broader and more holistic approach to systemic change, including legislation and regulatory reforms, education, and a commitment to addressing root causes. The key to success lies in partnerships, where every stakeholder along the supply chain\u2014 from governments and NGOs to retailers and brands\u2014 plays a key role in shared responsibility.<\/li>\n<li>Certification is one of the most successful and proven tools available for driving progress towards sustainability practices. Research has shown that credible certification programs lead to tangible benefits such as improved worker well-being and livelihoods, increased yields and prices for farmers, and improvements in ecosystem quality. Certification is an important part of the solution but should not be seen as a silver bullet. While it can help mitigate risks and promote responsible practices, it cannot by itself solve any country\u2019s entrenched socioeconomic problems.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><strong>4C<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>4C Responds to Questions about Finca La Arboleda, Colombia<\/p>\n<p>4C Services acknowledges the recent allegations of labour rights violations at Finca La Arboleda, as reported by\u00a0 Rep\u00f3rter Brasil. We are treating these allegations with the utmost seriousness and appreciate Rep\u00f3rter Brasil\u2019s reporting, which is vital for our compliance efforts. Using the reporter\u2019s GPS coordinates, we have confirmed Finca\u00a0 La Arboleda\u2019s identity and its corresponding records in our system. However, we must clarify that this farm was\u00a0 part of a 4C certified unit only between June 2, 2023, and August 6, 2024. <strong>The farm is currently not part of any 4C\u00a0 certified unit.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>However, despite the farm\u2019s status outside of our system, we would like to address the specific concerns raised\u00a0 by Rep\u00f3rter Brasil to demonstrate our commitment to transparency and provide insight into our standards and\u00a0 processes.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Addressing Specific Concerns:\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <strong>Verbal Labour Contracts (Criterion 2.1.10): <\/strong>4C standards require written labour contracts, aligning with\u00a0 local laws and regulations. While oral contracts may be permissible under specific national legislation (as\u00a0 in Colombia) and in exceptional cases, they must adhere to 4C guidance and verification protocols.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <strong>Excessive Working Hours (Criterion 2.1.13): <\/strong>The 4C Code of Conduct addresses working hours and\u00a0 overtime, acknowledging the demands of harvest season activities. It mandates a maximum of 48 working\u00a0 hours per week, or fewer if required by national law. Overtime must be voluntary, fully compensated, and\u00a0 limited to 12 hours per week. Exceptions are permissible only during peak harvest season, and for a\u00a0 maximum of two months. 4C provides verification guidance for auditors, which includes reviewing\u00a0 timesheets, working time records, and payment slips, conducting worker interviews, and engaging with\u00a0 community stakeholders as needed to confirm compliance.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <strong>Adequate Housing (Criterion 2.2.1): <\/strong>The described housing conditions at Finca La Arboleda are\u00a0 inconsistent with 4C\u2019s definition of \u201cadequate housing,\u201d which includes basic amenities like separate\u00a0 beds, proper sanitation, and safe construction.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <strong>Alignment with 4C\u2019s Mission: <\/strong>Even though this farm is not currently part of the 4C system, this situation\u00a0 highlights the value of stakeholder input in driving continuous improvement and effective implementation\u00a0 of our standards.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <strong>Transparency at Farm Level: <\/strong>We recognize the importance of transparency and are exploring options to\u00a0 enhance public access to information about farm-level certifications, while considering crucial\u00a0 requirements on data protection regulations.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <strong>Minimum Wage: <\/strong>We acknowledge the complexity of ensuring fair compensation for farmers within the\u00a0 diverse economic landscapes of coffee-producing regions. Instead of setting fixed minimum prices, 4C\u00a0 focuses on strengthening farmers\u2019 economic resilience through sustainable practices, improved\u00a0 productivity, and access to premium markets. This approach aims to empower farmers to navigate market\u00a0 fluctuations effectively.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>4C\u2019s Role and Responsibilities\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>As an independent third-party certification scheme, 4C establishes sustainability standards for green coffee\u00a0 production.While system users, including companies and their cooperating groups of producers and farmers, are\u00a0 primarily responsible for implementing and complying with these standards, 4C ensures compliance through\u00a0 rigorous audits conducted by independent Certification Bodies (CBs) and its integrity program. These independent\u00a0 CBs, working in collaboration with 4C, conduct regular and additional audits to verify compliance with 4C requirements, thereby ensuring neutrality and credibility. We emphasize that 4C operates independently and\u00a0 maintains a clear separation between standard-setting and implementation.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Strengthening Trust and Ensuring Compliance\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>To further uphold the integrity of our system, we have established the 4C Integrity Program. This program includes\u00a0 rigorous integrity audits and a grievance and complaint channel, enabling us to effectively monitor compliance and\u00a0 address any reported issues. We are committed to thoroughly investigating any allegations brought to our attention\u00a0 and taking appropriate action.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>To maintain the integrity of the 4C system concerning La Arboleda farm, we have placed an alert in our database.\u00a0 If Finca La Arboleda seeks 4C certification again, it will undergo a rigorous extra compliance audit under our\u00a0 Integrity Program, in addition to the standard certification audit. This will ensure all past non-conformities are\u00a0 resolved and current standards are met before reincorporation. We will also require the farm to remove the\u00a0 unauthorized, outdated 4C logo shown in the reporters\u2019 photos.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Our Commitment to Continuous Improvement\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>4C remains steadfast in its commitment to assessing and addressing reported risks through targeted interventions.\u00a0 We continuously evaluate real-world conditions to ensure compliance with our requirements and drive positive\u00a0 change within the coffee sector.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Recognizing the inherent challenges in auditing sensitive social risks, 4C is leading a joint project, made possible\u00a0 by a grant from the ISEAL Innovations Fund, with support from the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs\u00a0 (SECO) and the UK International Development, to enhance the detection of human rights violations in audits. This\u00a0 project will introduce more responsive and context-specific approaches, improving human rights due diligence. As\u00a0 part of this initiative, 4C will conduct free training sessions on human rights, labour, and social topics in Colombia,\u00a0 open to all 4C system users. Additionally, 4C will develop online training materials tailored to the local context for\u00a0 farmer accessibility.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Certification is a proven tool for progress, but it cannot always provide a 100% guarantee that all farmers and\u00a0 certified units are following the requirements. Certification supports also risk assessments and mitigation\u00a0 measures. Its effectiveness is maximized when combined with stakeholder engagement, robust grievance\u00a0 mechanisms, civil society oversight, and supply chain transparency.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>4C is dedicated to collaborative improvement and invites comments from all stakeholders. We urge ongoing\u00a0 collaboration with companies, producers, and civil society organizations to address the systemic challenges\u00a0 highlighted in the industry, working together towards a more sustainable and equitable coffee sector.<\/p>\n<p>Cologne, 28<sup>th <\/sup>March 2025<\/p>\n<h1><strong>STARBUCKS<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>At the time of the investigation neither of these farms (Finca La Arboleda, Finca San Fernando) were C.A.F.E. Practices verified, and Starbucks was not buying coffee from them.<\/p>\n<p>We take allegations like these extremely seriously and require suppliers to comply with our <a href=\"https:\/\/content-prod-live.cert.starbucks.com\/binary\/v2\/asset\/143-96213.pdf\">Supplier Code of Conduct<\/a>. We are actively engaged with farms to ensure they adhere to our standards and each supply chain is required to undergo reverification regularly. We remain committed to working with our business partners to meet our expectations. This is how we work with supply partners like Federaci\u00f3n Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia (FNC).<\/p>\n<p>The cornerstone of our approach to buying coffee is <a href=\"https:\/\/about.starbucks.com\/press\/2024\/cafe-practices-starbucks-approach-to-ethically-sourcing-coffee\/\">Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.) Practices<\/a>, which was one of the coffee industry\u2019s first set of ethical sourcing standards when it launched in 2004 and we continuously work to improve these standards. As you may know, C.A.F.E. Practices was developed in collaboration with Conservation International. C.A.F.E. Practices is a verification program that measures farms against economic, social, and environmental criteria, all designed to promote transparent, profitable, and sustainable coffee growing practices while also protecting the well-being of coffee farmers and workers, their families, and their communities. To maintain an active status in the program, each supply chain is required to undergo reverification regularly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Follow-up question sent by Rep\u00f3rter Brasil (27\/03\/2025)<\/strong>: Is it possible to know when these (month\/year) two properties lost their status of \u201cverified\u201d on C.A.F.E. Practices?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Starbucks<\/strong>: reverification occurs every one to two years. These farms (Finca La Arboleda, Finca San Fernando) had been verified previously, but those verifications lapsed, and we were no longer purchasing from them at the time of the investigation.<\/p>\n<h1><strong>NESTL\u00c9<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p><em>Nestl\u00e9 is committed to promoting decent working conditions and upholding human rights throughout its supply chain, actively working to prevent human rights abuses and labor violations. We take all allegations of non-compliance very seriously. Where there are claims that our standards have not been met, we work with our suppliers to investigate immediately and take action as necessary.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Moreover, our supplier list is updated on a yearly basis once information is available after the reporting period. It should be available shortly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NKG<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Statement by Neumann Kaffee Gruppe<\/p>\n<p>Regarding reports about labor rights violation within the Colombian coffee sector\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>We have read with great dismay the report on labor rights violations in the Colombian coffee sector. Neumann Kaffee Gruppe (NKG) does not tolerate any form of human rights violations such as forced labor, including human trafficking and slavery-like practices. NKG is committed to eliminating forced labor and any other form of labor rights violations within our sphere of influence. We have immediately launched an internal investigation into the matter and have reviewed our business relationships with the farms mentioned in the report:\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Finca La Arboleda, located in Andes, in the state of Antioquia\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Finca La Siberia, located in Palermo, in the state of Hu\u00edla\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Finca Los Naranjos, located in Salgar, in the state of Antioquia.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Regarding our Colombian export company SKN Caribecaf\u00e9, we can confirm that we did not and do not have a farm called La Arboleda in the Andes, Antioquia, or a farm called La Siberia in Palermo, Huila as part of our supply chains. We had a farm called Los Naranjos in Salgar, Antioquia, as part of a supply chain in the past. To be able to verify if it is the farm mentioned in the report with certainty, we would need to know the name of the farm owner or the exact location. In any case, the business relationship ended in 2023 and SKN Caribecaf\u00e9 did not purchase any coffee from this farm in 2024.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Our US-based importer, Rothfos Corporation, has sent a request to its suppliers asking whether they have purchased coffee from these farms and sold it to Rothfos Corporation. These requests are still open, so we will not be able to provide more detailed information before the deadline.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Update, March 27, 2025: The supplier of Rothfos Corporation, FNC, confirmed that no coffee from these farms was allocated to Rothfos Corporation or will be shipped in the future.<\/p>\n<p>We can confirm that our German import company, Bernhard Rothfos, had and has no direct business relations with any of these farms.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Update, March 27, 2025: This means that we are currently seeing no business relationships with these farm.<\/p>\n<p>However, due to the complexity of the supply chain, we can never completely rule out the possibility that coffee from these farms may have entered our supply chain through third party sales.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Once we have fully identified potential business relationships with the farms, we can take appropriate action. This could be that we agree with the producers on improvements to working conditions on the ground and monitor these steps closely. However, it may also be that we suspend or permanently terminate the business relationship. We will continue to investigate that matter and of course keep you informed about any new findings.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>NKG is well aware of our responsibilities in the countries we operate in. We always act with respect for and in compliance with fundamental rights and national legislation. We have written down our values and beliefs as the basis of our business in our NKG Code of Conduct; this is an integral part of our value-oriented corporate culture. In order to fulfill our responsibility for a growing, sustainable coffee industry in the future, we have, among other things, launched the NKG Responsible Business Program. The program sets specific goals that define responsible and sustainable business practices at NKG. In this context, please refer to the NKG Sustainability Report 2024, published on September 2, 2024, which provides insights into the Responsible Business Program and where NKG stands and where we want to go in the future. Two of our key objectives are to \u201cstrengthen sustainability performance within our supply chains\u201d and \u201cimprove transparency and ethical behavior in collaboration with our direct suppliers.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>NKG is committed to creating transparency and sustainability in our coffee supply chains. Our program NKG Verified includes traceability and compliance with critical criteria such as no worst forms of child labor, no child labor, no forced labor, school attendance, no use of prohibited pesticides, protection of forests and ecosystems, and continuous improvement. To meet our human rights due diligence obligations, we established our Supplier Code of Conduct (SCoC) in 2022, in which we set our values and expectations towards our suppliers. The SCoC has been actively communicated to our key suppliers. Suppliers are encouraged to communicate the SCoC to sub-suppliers as well.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Despite our efforts, we are still in the process of addressing labor issues in the coffee industry. Due to the complex structure of the coffee supply chain, it remains a challenge to cover the entire supply chain. In addition, we cannot guarantee that suppliers who are part of this supply chain are always fully compliant. However, we work closely with our suppliers and are constantly striving to improve working conditions. As NKG, we are committed to critically reviewing our own actions, improving or adapting them as necessary, and to being and remaining in constant communication with our suppliers and customers.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>For further questions please do not hesitate to contact us!\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Further Links and information:\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nkg.net\/responsibility\/\">Responsibility \u2013 Neumann Kaffee Gruppe (NKG)<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nkg.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/NKG-CoC-2023_EN-web.pdf\">NKG Code of Conduct<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nkg.net\/responsibility\/\">NKG Responsible Business Program<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"https:\/\/sustainabilityreport.nkg.coffee\/\">NKG Sustainability Report 2024\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nkg.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/NKG-SCoC-Web-EN.pdf\">Supplier Code of Conduct<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h1><strong>VOLCAFE<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>All companies within the Volcafe Ltd group and the ED&amp;F Man Commodities group have a policy to operate in full compliance with national and international laws. We take allegations of human rights violations seriously and are committed to eradicating forced labour and all forms of abuse in the coffee supply chain. Volcafe has a zero-tolerance policy for human rights violations in its operations.<\/p>\n<p>Through rigorous due diligence, we assess and mitigate risks in our supply chains, ensuring that we work with suppliers who uphold ethical business standards. With operations in eleven coffee producing countries, Volcafe works closely with coffee producers to provide a holistic response to the challenges they face. Through the implementation of responsibly sourced and certified supply chains, Volcafe undertakes a range of activities aimed at improving the conditions for farmers, workers, and communities in the coffee supply chain.<\/p>\n<h1><strong>TCHIBO<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>As a company committed to human rights in accordance with international standards as laid out in our \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tchibo-nachhaltigkeit.de\/media\/pages\/mm_download-files\/8239491b16-1737978378\/tchibo-agrarpolicy-english.pdf\">human rights and environmental policy in agricultural supply chains<\/a>\u201d we handle grievances and allegations with due care.\u00a0<\/p>\n<h1>We have checked our traceability data. We did buy coffee from Carcafe during the period in question, but this coffee did not come from Finca La Arboleda in Antioquia, but from farms in other regions of Colombia.<\/h1>\n<h1><strong>FNC<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>Por medio del presente, damos respuesta a sus inquietudes enviadas por correo electr\u00f3nico el d\u00eda 24 de marzo del presente a\u00f1o.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>A continuaci\u00f3n las preguntas formuladas por usted y sus respectivas respuestas:\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>1) \u00bfQu\u00e9 medidas tomar\u00e1 FNC tras conocer los casos presentados por Rep\u00f3rter Brasil?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>La problem\u00e1tica de la protecci\u00f3n social para la mano de obra dedicada a la actividad de la caficultura, incluida la de los mismos productores de caf\u00e9 en Colombia, ha sido de atenci\u00f3n y estudio permanente por parte de la Federaci\u00f3n.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>La Federaci\u00f3n, ni desconoce ni minimiza la situaci\u00f3n de informalidad que rodea toda esta actividad, la cual no es ni diferente ni especial frente a la situaci\u00f3n de la ruralidad y del campo colombiano. De manera reiterada hemos sido voceros de iniciativas para generar pol\u00edticas p\u00fablicas que conduzcan a mejoras y avances en esta materia.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>No puede olvidarse que durante m\u00e1s de 9 d\u00e9cadas el mayor \u00f3rgano de gobierno para la conducci\u00f3n de la pol\u00edtica cafetera colombiana, ha sido conformado por los Ministros m\u00e1s importantes del ejecutivo de nuestro pa\u00eds. En la actualidad los Ministros de Hacienda, Agricultura, Comercio Exterior y el Director del DNP comparten con los representantes de los 15 Comit\u00e9s departamentales de cafeteros el Comit\u00e9 Nacional de Cafeteros. Como se ha indicado y es reconocido, en t\u00e9rminos generales, en el campo colombiano existe un alto nivel de informalidad por falta de una normativa aplicable en pensiones y riesgos laborales que en conjunto con el r\u00e9gimen subsidiado de salud (el 95% de los caficultores est\u00e1 cubierto por \u00e9ste) permita la inserci\u00f3n en la formalidad a la poblaci\u00f3n que labora en el campo y en la zona rural dispersa.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Fruto de ese trabajo conjunto, en materia de Seguridad y Salud en el trabajo se expidi\u00f3 por parte del Ministerio del Trabajo una normatividad diferencial para las Unidades de Producci\u00f3n Agropecuaria (UPAs) con menos de 10 trabajadores permanentes. (Decreto 1072 de 2015, Decreto 171 de 2016, y Resoluci\u00f3n 312 de 2019).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>De otro lado, es necesario tener en cuenta que para cualquier consideraci\u00f3n de orden legislativo o regulatorio se deber\u00e1 recordar que la gran mayor\u00eda de la caficultura colombiana cabe dentro de la definici\u00f3n de \u201cAgricultura campesina, familiar y comunitaria\u201d como el sistema de producci\u00f3n y organizaci\u00f3n gestionado y operado por mujeres, hombres, familias y comunidades campesinas, ind\u00edgenas, negras, afrodescendientes, raizales y palenqueras que conviven en los territorios rurales del pa\u00eds (UPRA, 2024).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>A partir de la definici\u00f3n anterior, y teniendo en cuenta que el 96,9% de los caficultores en Colombia, son peque\u00f1os caficultores con menos de 5 has. sembradas en caf\u00e9 (SICA, FNC, 2024), se clasifican dentro de la agricultura campesina, familiar y comunitaria. Con datos de la Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria (DANE, 2019), alrededor del 80% caben en la definici\u00f3n de agricultura familiar donde la fuerza de trabajo como su nombre lo indica es esencialmente familiar. Cualquier regulaci\u00f3n en materia de protecci\u00f3n social deber\u00e1 entonces ajustarse a esta realidad.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Adem\u00e1s, un estudio sobre los recolectores de caf\u00e9 encontr\u00f3 que alrededor del 45% de ellos son productores en unidades de producci\u00f3n agr\u00edcola familiar de tama\u00f1o peque\u00f1o (menos de 1 ha). De otra parte alrededor del 20% de los recolectores son itinerantes interdepartamentales, es decir que migran a lo largo de la zona cafetera siguiendo el comportamiento de la cosecha con el fin de maximizar sus ingresos provenientes de esta actividad. El remanente, o sea el 35%, son itinerantes intradepartamentales (Ensayos de Econom\u00eda Cafetera, No.32 (2016\/17), Federaci\u00f3n Nacional de Cafeteros \u201cLa recolecci\u00f3n de caf\u00e9 en Colombia. Una caracterizaci\u00f3n del mercado laboral\u201d).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>La legislaci\u00f3n laboral colombiana hoy vigente presenta vac\u00edos respecto de c\u00f3mo aplicar conceptos propios de los contratos laborales para actividades urbanas a las actividades rurales y sobre todo en la caficultura en donde la itinerancia y la temporalidad son el denominador com\u00fan.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>De conformidad con lo expuesto y teniendo en cuenta sus afirmaciones, se puede decir, que la mayor\u00eda de la poblaci\u00f3n laboral cafetera puede estar en la informalidad, m\u00e1s no en la ilegalidad \u2013 conceptos distintos -, por falta de una regulaci\u00f3n adecuada y aplicable.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Igualmente se recuerda que las relaciones laborales no requieren un documento escrito, se pueden formalizar de manera verbal. Adicionalmente la mayor\u00eda de las labores del campo son labores ocasionales, accidentales o transitorias, de corta duraci\u00f3n, y en \u00e9pocas de cosecha, adem\u00e1s de ser desarrolladas en zonas en donde no existe conectividad ni servicios bancarios, presupuestos necesarios, mas no suficientes para la inclusi\u00f3n y formalizaci\u00f3n del campo.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>2) \u00bfLa misi\u00f3n de la FNC de \u201cprocurar el bienestar del caficultor colombiano\u201d tambi\u00e9n incluye los recolectores de caf\u00e9? \u00bfLa FNC cree que ha logrado su objetivo de garantizar condiciones laborales m\u00e1s justas para todos los involucrados en la cadena productiva del caf\u00e9 colombiano?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>La misi\u00f3n de la FNC, tal como lo establece el art\u00edculo 2 de sus Estatutos, es \u201cprocurar y promover prioritariamente la prosperidad y el inter\u00e9s general de los productores de caf\u00e9\u201d. Igualmente, y de conformidad con el art\u00edculo 3, la FNC \u201ctiene por objeto orientar, organizar y fomentar la caficultura colombiana y propender porque sea rentable, sostenible y mundialmente competitiva, procurando el bienestar del productor de caf\u00e9 a trav\u00e9s de mecanismos de colaboraci\u00f3n, participaci\u00f3n y fomento ya fuere de car\u00e1cter social, econ\u00f3mico, cient\u00edfico, tecnol\u00f3gico, ambiental, industrial o comercial, buscando mantener el car\u00e1cter de capital social estrat\u00e9gico de la caficultura colombiana.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>La FNC trabaja a diario para lograr el objetivo del mayor bienestar de los caficultores de Colombia, incluyendo las condiciones laborales m\u00e1s justas para todos los involucrados en la cadena productiva. Por supuesto, siempre hay oportunidades de mejora y en ellas enfoca sus mayores esfuerzos la FNC.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>3) \u00bfLa FNC cree ser posible garantizar condiciones decentes de trabajo para los recolectores de caf\u00e9 que trabajan en las fincas colombianas? \u00bfC\u00f3mo?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Como se indic\u00f3 en la respuesta anterior, la FNC hace esfuerzos constantes para mejorar las condiciones de vida de los caficultores del pa\u00eds, llevando a cabo distintos proyectos, programas y actividades. Se recuerda que la FNC es una entidad sin \u00e1nimo de lucro, de car\u00e1cter gremial, integrada por los productores de caf\u00e9 federados en el pa\u00eds.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>4) La reforma laboral, propuesta en marzo de 2023 por el Ejecutivo colombiano, incluy\u00f3 dos art\u00edculos sobre el trabajo rural: la creaci\u00f3n de un contrato agropecuario (art\u00edculo 29), incentivando la formalizaci\u00f3n de relaciones laborales permanentes y estacionales, y el establecimiento de un jornal agropecuario (art\u00edculo 29), que flexibilizaba la duraci\u00f3n de los contratos, permitiendo el cobro de beneficios por d\u00eda. Estos puntos fueron excluidos durante la aprobaci\u00f3n del texto en la C\u00e1mara de Representantes. \u00bfLa FNC estaba a favor de mantener estos dos puntos? \u00bfCu\u00e1l es la valoraci\u00f3n de la FNC sobre la reforma laboral?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>La FNC considera que los art\u00edculos mencionados eran susceptibles de ser mejorados en el sentido de recoger de una mejor manera la realidad del campo y de la caficultura.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Por otra parte, una lectura cuidadosa de los art\u00edculos relacionados con el campo, no permit\u00edan lo que se indica en su pregunta y en particular las cotizaciones por d\u00edas y con la flexibilidad para tener en cuenta actividades estacionales, y actividades en distintas fincas a lo largo del d\u00eda y la poblaci\u00f3n itinerante, requer\u00edan para lograr una oportuna y adecuada inclusi\u00f3n en la poblaci\u00f3n laboral.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>5) \u00bfLa FNC eval\u00faa que la informalidad en las relaciones laborales durante la cosecha de caf\u00e9 es un problema a enfrentar? \u00bfExiste alguna estrategia o propuesta por parte de la Federaci\u00f3n para reducir este problema?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>La Federaci\u00f3n de manera permanente y en su interacci\u00f3n con el gobierno nacional sigue generando iniciativas que mejoren la calidad de vida de quienes participan en la caficultura. No puede olvidarse que este gremio ha contribuido con bienes p\u00fablicos apreciados por la poblaci\u00f3n tales como v\u00edas terciarias para conectar el territorio y permitir sacar la cosecha y entregarla en los m\u00e1s de 500 puntos de compra organizados, servicios m\u00e9dicos, escuelas rurales, vinculaci\u00f3n a la salud contributiva y subsidiada, vinculaci\u00f3n a los BEPS y dem\u00e1s proyectos productivos y actividades que hacen de la FNC una de las organizaciones que m\u00e1s progreso y desarrollo han llevado al campo.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>En los \u00faltimos 10 a\u00f1os, la FNC ha invertido y ejecutado proyectos de inversi\u00f3n social para beneficiar las familias caficultoras colombianas por un valor aproximado de COP $2,213 billones (USD 539 Millones a la tasa de hoy), de los cuales casi el 70% son el resultado de la gesti\u00f3n de aliados privados, p\u00fablicos, nacionales e internacionales y el 30% a inversiones directas del Fondo Nacional del Caf\u00e9.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Del total de esta inversi\u00f3n, el 54% se ejecut\u00f3 en proyectos relacionados con el eje econ\u00f3mico, impactando directamente en la rentabilidad de las fincas, mejorando la productividad y mejoramiento del precio. El 39% se invirtieron en proyectos de tipo social relacionados con el mejoramiento de infraestructura vial, educaci\u00f3n, saneamiento b\u00e1sico, mejoramiento de vivienda rural entre otros y un 7% en proyectos de tipo ambiental orientados a la gesti\u00f3n del agua y recursos naturales.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Tambi\u00e9n hay que recordar que a\u00f1os atr\u00e1s esta entidad acompa\u00f1\u00f3 una importante iniciativa que se convirti\u00f3 en el \u201cel piso de protecci\u00f3n social\u201d (PPS) como mecanismo de protecci\u00f3n social, dirigido especialmente a trabajadores que ganaban menos de un salario m\u00ednimo mensual legal vigente (SMMLV) y que obligaba a los contratantes de esa mano de obra a contribuir con el 15% del ingreso para lograr un beneficio peri\u00f3dico que en conjunto con un seguro inclusivo, se convirtieran en ese primer paso hacia la formalizaci\u00f3n y la protecci\u00f3n social de dicha poblaci\u00f3n. Dicho mecanismo, consagrado en el art\u00edculo 193 de la ley 1955 de 2019, infortunadamente fue declarado inexequible por la Corte Constitucional por vicio de forma (por estar contenido en una ley del plan) en su sentencia No. 276 del 19 de agosto de 2021.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Por \u00faltimo, se se\u00f1ala que tal y como exigen diversos est\u00e1ndares voluntarios de sostenibilidad, las auditor\u00edas y verificaciones anuales deben ser realizadas por terceras partes independientes y acreditadas por los mismos sellos \u2013 organismos de certificaci\u00f3n y\/o verificaci\u00f3n. El cumplimiento de este proceso permite contar con cadenas de suministro de caf\u00e9 certificado como 4C, Rainforest, Fairtrade y C.A.F.E Practices, entre otros.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Los organismos de certificaci\u00f3n se adhieren a los protocolos de certificaci\u00f3n de los distintos est\u00e1ndares de sostenibilidad y realizan las auditor\u00edas en medio de la cosecha a una muestra representativa de los productores que participan en cada programa. Estas auditor\u00edas abordan temas relacionados con condiciones laborales, protecci\u00f3n de los derechos humanos, entre otros aspectos sociales y ambientales, de acuerdo con la legislaci\u00f3n nacional aplicable y como requieren los acuerdos internacionales.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>En conclusi\u00f3n, la FNC no tiene ninguna injerencia sobre los organismos de certificaci\u00f3n, terceros imparciales, ajenos a la FNC los cuales realizan las auditor\u00edas correspondientes para evaluar si otorgan o no el certificado en menci\u00f3n a un grupo de caficultores espec\u00edfico.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Cordialmente,<\/p>\n<p>REYNALDO ANDR\u00c9S D\u00cdAZ MEDINA<\/p>\n<p>Representante Legal Suplente<\/p>\n<h1><strong>CAFEXPORT<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>Ante su invitaci\u00f3n a responder en la discusi\u00f3n, le informo que la finca San Fernando de Ciudad Bol\u00edvar mencionada en su correo no hace parte de nuestros programas de sostenibilidad ni de nuestra cadena de suministro.<\/p>\n<h1><strong>N\u00c3O RESPONDERAM<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>As empresas colombianas Carcaf\u00e9 e Expocafe e as cooperativas de cafeicultores de Salgar e Hu\u00edla n\u00e3o responderam aos questionamentos enviados pela <strong>Rep\u00f3rter Brasil<\/strong>. A compradora Sucafina tamb\u00e9m n\u00e3o enviou respostas.<\/p>\n<p>Os donos das fazendas Los Naranjos e San Fernando n\u00e3o foram localizados pela reportagem. Entrevistado pessoalmente pela <strong>Rep\u00f3rter Brasil<\/strong> durante a viagem de campo, o propriet\u00e1rio da fazenda La Siberia n\u00e3o foi localizado pela reportagem novamente para responder perguntas adicionais. J\u00e1 a Fazenda Arboleda n\u00e3o respondeu aos questionamentos enviados at\u00e9 o fechamento deste relat\u00f3rio.<\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/reporterbrasil.org.br\/2025\/06\/integra-condicoes-trabalho-colheita-cafe-colombia\/\">Posicionamentos para reportagens sobre\u00a0condi\u00e7\u00f5es de trabalho da colheita de caf\u00e9 na Col\u00f4mbia<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/reporterbrasil.org.br\/\">Rep\u00f3rter Brasil<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- Begin Yuzo --><div class='yuzo_related_post style-1'  data-version='5.12.89'><!-- without result --><div class='yuzo_clearfixed yuzo__title yuzo__title'><h3>Related Post<\/h3><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  <div class=\"relatedthumb \" style=\"width:125px;float:left;overflow:hidden;\">  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <a  href=\"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/video-advogado-de-golpista-tentou-causar-provocando-moraes-e-levou-um-fora-fique-a-vontade\/\"  >\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <div class=\"yuzo-img-wrap \" style=\"width: 125px;height:90px;\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"yuzo-img\" style=\"background:url('https:\/\/redept.org\/blogosfera\/wp-content\/plugins\/yuzo-related-post\/assets\/images\/default.png') 50% 50% no-repeat;width: 125px;height:90px;margin-bottom: 5px;background-size: cover; \"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t   <span class=\"yuzo__text--title\" style=\"font-size:13px;\">V\u00eddeo \u2013 Advogado de golpista tentou causar provoca...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  <div class=\"relatedthumb \" style=\"width:125px;float:left;overflow:hidden;\">  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <a  href=\"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/como-ter-acesso-ao-pacote-microsoft-office-gratuitamente-pelo-governo-federal\/\"  >\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <div class=\"yuzo-img-wrap \" style=\"width: 125px;height:90px;\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"yuzo-img\" style=\"background:url('https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-5-150x150.png') 50% 50% no-repeat;width: 125px;height:90px;margin-bottom: 5px;background-size: cover; \"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t   <span class=\"yuzo__text--title\" style=\"font-size:13px;\">Como ter acesso ao pacote Microsoft Office gratuit...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  <div class=\"relatedthumb \" style=\"width:125px;float:left;overflow:hidden;\">  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <a  href=\"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/lula-passa-por-cirurgia-e-segue-na-uti\/\"  >\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <div class=\"yuzo-img-wrap \" style=\"width: 125px;height:90px;\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"yuzo-img\" style=\"background:url('https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/HOSPITAL-150x150.webp') 50% 50% no-repeat;width: 125px;height:90px;margin-bottom: 5px;background-size: cover; \"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t   <span class=\"yuzo__text--title\" style=\"font-size:13px;\">Lula passa por cirurgia e segue na UTI<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  <div class=\"relatedthumb \" style=\"width:125px;float:left;overflow:hidden;\">  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <a  href=\"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/israel-acumula-divida-de-15-bilhoes-de-dolares-apos-cinco-semanas-de-guerra\/\"  >\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <div class=\"yuzo-img-wrap \" style=\"width: 125px;height:90px;\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"yuzo-img\" style=\"background:url('https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/he90xvbaqaawnjj-150x150.jpg') 50% 50% no-repeat;width: 125px;height:90px;margin-bottom: 5px;background-size: cover; \"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t   <span class=\"yuzo__text--title\" style=\"font-size:13px;\">Israel acumula d\u00edvida de 15 bilh\u00f5es de d\u00f3lares ap\u00f3...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/div>\n<\/div> <script>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  jQuery(document).ready(function( $ ){\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/jQuery('.yuzo_related_post').equalizer({ overflow : 'relatedthumb' });\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tjQuery('.yuzo_related_post .yuzo_wraps').equalizer({ columns : '> div' });\n\t\t\t\t\t\t   })\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  <\/script> <!-- End Yuzo :) -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Leia o relat\u00f3rio completo aqui FAIRTRADE Responses to questions from Rep\u00f3rter Brasil about coffee farms and worker conditions in Colombia Please note: Cooperativa Departamental de Cafeicultores de Hu\u00edla (Cadefihuila) and the Cooperative de Caficultores de Salgar are Fairtrade certified producer organisations and therefore must adhere to the Fairtrade Standard for Small-scale Producer Organisations not the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5803,5879,5471],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anexos-posicionamentos","category-conteudo-original-em-portugues","category-politica-nacional"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35306"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35306\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redept.com.br\/blogosfera\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}